Obama’s diplomatic mission to medical treatment or “creating history”

Delayed visits to Indonesia and Australia, staying in the country to promote the health care reform bill, which will make 95% of Americans feel free.

After a year of legislative ups and downs, Obama’s “National Health Insurance Reform” case is about to face a final vote in Congress.

The historic "health reform" promoted by the US government will solve the problem of medical treatment for 32 million uninsured Americans, making medical insurance cover almost all Americans.

In order to promote universal health insurance, the US middle class will receive tax breaks, and the medical insurance plan for the poor will also expand.

Comprehensive Xinhua News Agency US President Barack Obama decided on the 18th to postpone his visit to Indonesia and Australia this month until June this year, so that he can stay in the country to promote the health care reform bill in Congress. The health care reform bill will increase the coverage of medical insurance in the United States to around 95%.

The House of Representatives is about to vote on the final case

White House spokesman Gibbs said that Obama is disappointed and regretful about postponing visits to Indonesia and Australia, but he has told the leaders of these countries that the health care reform bill is crucial. Gibbs said: "The president believes that he should now stay in Washington to complete this matter." Obama has previously postponed the visit date from the 18th to the 21st.

The Democratic Party leader of the US House of Representatives announced the final version of the medical insurance reform bill on the 18th, and plans to hold a vote in the House of Representatives on the 21st. House Speaker Pelosi and House Majority (Democratic) leader Hoyer announced the bill in Congress on the same day.

Will create history of health care reform

Pelosi said that this bill represents progress and, once adopted, will create history. Hoyer said he believes that the House of Representatives can pass the bill on the 21st.

The final version of the bill, announced on the same day, is actually divided into two parts, the Health Reform Act passed by the Senate last December and the “Budget Coordination” bill of Congressional Democrats aimed at amending parts of the Senate bill. Since the Democratic Party promised to give Congress and the public a 72-hour period to evaluate the content of the bill before the vote, the House of Representatives will not be able to vote on this until the 21st.

On the same day, the US Congressional Budget Office also announced the results of the final version of the health care reform budget assessment, thereby creating conditions for the House of Representatives to vote on the bill this weekend.

White-collar workers are tax-deducted and poor people get help

The Congressional Budget Office said that the bill is expected to reduce the US government budget deficit by $138 billion in the first 10 years after its entry into force, and reduce it by about $1.2 trillion in the second decade. At the same time, the bill will cost $940 billion in the first 10 years after its entry into force. The Congressional Budget Office said that by providing tax breaks to the middle class and expanding the coverage of health insurance schemes for low-income groups, the health care reform bill will protect the current 32 million Americans without health insurance, thereby increasing coverage across the US. About 95%.

In January this year, after the Democrats lost the "absolute majority" seat in the Senate, the Obamacare reform plan was deadlocked. Although the Democrats still maintain a simple majority in the Senate, they no longer have a 60-vote majority that prevents Republicans from using the obstruction process.

However, the Democrats did not give up on this and hoped that the health reform bill would be passed through the special legislative process of “budget coordination”. Under this procedure, the bill can be passed in the Senate with a simple majority, that is, 51 votes.

- Paradox

US media debates "reform costs"

Controversy over the fiscal deficit caused by the reform, The New York Times called for compromise

Faced with the frustration of the proponents and the doubts of the opponents, all parties should abandon their differences and should have a willingness to compromise and a good attitude. After all, the United States really needs a comprehensive medical reform.

The final version of the "medical insurance case" was finally released, and the major media in the United States launched a debate on the 18th. The cost of medical reform is one of the focuses.

The New York Times published an editorial expressing support for health care reform, and hoped that the two parties would abandon their differences and work together to pass the final medical reform. The editorial said that the moderate revision of the Senate version is understandable, and some liberals who tried to boycott the "medical reform case" in Congress should realize that this is currently possible in the economic recession and will bring the best benefits. "medical insurance case." Some hawks who care about the budget must also realize that this "medical insurance case" can continue to reduce the fiscal deficit in recent years more than other options.

However, the "Washington Post" has reservations about the "medical reform case" to reduce the deficit. The newspaper said: "The 25-page report of the budget office is expected to reduce the deficit by 138 billion in the next 10 years... but their work is more artistic, not scientific." The newspaper believes that many experts are This figure expresses different views, so it is not certain that the “medical reform case” will reduce the fiscal deficit.

The Wall Street Journal also questioned: "How much does it cost to reduce the deficit in this medical reform?" The newspaper also quoted Republican lawmakers as saying that the "medical reform case" could create more jobs. It is believed that restrictions on private insurance companies in the “medical reform case” will reduce employment opportunities and reduce wages for workers.

However, the New York Times reminded the public that faced with the frustration of the proponents and the doubts of the opponents, the parties should abandon their differences. "All should have a willingness to compromise and a good attitude. After all, the United States really needs a comprehensive medical reform."

Concentrated Powder

SICHUAN UNIWELL BIOTECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD. , https://www.uniwellbio.com